The outcome
document of the High-level Meeting is expected to lead to a disability-inclusive
post-2015 agenda developed in a transparent and participatory manner that includes listening to voices of persons with disabilities from
around the world. Hence regional and national consultation meetings are of
importance for the process of the High-level Meeting.
The Millennium Development Goals did not include persons
with disabilities, which should not be repeated in the post-2015 development
framework. More recently, persons with disabilities were excluded and not
mentioned in the Millennium Development Goals Report 2012. Even as poverty
reduction and access to water targets may be achieved and steady progress has
been observed on reducing child mortality, decreasing malaria and other global
diseases, children and persons with disabilities are still largely excluded from
these efforts. The progress has been uneven. The human rights principles such
as equality and non-discrimination, concern for the most marginalized in
particular, have not been paid enough attention to in this context.
Moreover, my observations of disability inclusive
development show that many governments fail to provide the proper
infrastructure for disability inclusive development by the lack of appropriate
coordinating mechanisms within government and at the highest level. This
results in a lack of influence from the disability mechanism within government
to impact on budget processes and other resources and capacity to implement and
monitor disability inclusive development. The lack of high-level infrastructure
at a national level also weakens the monitoring of disability related policy
implementation and often results in a lack of consultation with DPOs. Thus I
strongly recommend that disability
inclusive development would become one of the Sustainable Development Goals
so that persons with disabilities are finally mainstreamed at all levels.
Secondly, the outcome document needs to reflect on priorities among
persons with disabilities particularly those of the global South. In my
capacity as United Nations Special Rapporteur on Disability, I would like to
present four priority areas: 1)
education, 2) employment, 3) health, and 4) social protection. These are
the most acutely expressed needs and rights of persons with disabilities around
the world as far as I have observed.
Thirdly, progress of these
priority areas should be regularly measured and followed up so as to make
sustainable and positive changes in lives of persons with disabilities. For
that, I would like to suggest the following possible indicators for each
priority learning from existing indicators including the Incheon Strategy for
the Third Asia and Pacific Decade of Persons with Disabilities, among others:
- Education
·
Number of children with disabilities receiving early childhood
intervention
·
Primary education enrolment rate of children with
disabilities
·
Secondary education enrolment rate of children with
disabilities
·
Proportion of children who are deaf that receive
instruction in sign language
·
Proportion of students with visual impairments that have educational materials in
formats that are readily accessible
·
Proportion of students with intellectual disabilities, developmental
disabilities, deafblindness, autism and other disabilities who have assistive
devices, adapted curricula and appropriate learning materials
·
Duration of teacher training
- Employment
·
Proportion of persons with disabilities living below the US$ 1.25 (PPP)
per day international poverty line as compared to the overall population
·
Ratio of persons with disabilities in employment as compared to the
general population in employment
·
Proportion of persons with disabilities who participate in
government-funded vocational training and other employment-support programmes
as compared to a proportion of all people trained
·
Proportion of persons with disabilities living below the national
poverty line
- Health
·
Proportion of persons with disabilities who use government-supported
health-care programmes, as compared to the general population
·
Proportion of girls and women with disabilities who access sexual and
reproductive health services of government and civil society, as compared to
women and girls without disabilities
·
Proportion of pre- and antenatal care facilities that provide information
and services regarding early detection of disability in children and protection
of the rights of children with disabilities
4. Social Protection
·
Coverage of persons with disabilities within social protection
programmes, including social insurance and social assistance programmes
·
Availability of government-funded services and programmes, including for
personal assistance and peer counselling, that enable persons with disabilities
to live independently in the community
·
Number of government-supported programmes for care services, including
for respite care
·
Availability of national community-based rehabilitation programmes
·
Availability of health insurance for persons with disabilities
·
A decrease in the unmet need for assistance and support
services
Lastly, I would also like to share the voices from Africa based on the consultation meeting that I convened in
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in November 2012. Some of the key points include
following:
1.
The
High-level Meeting on Disability and Development should have a broad and
inclusive preparatory process, including regional consultations, with clear
timelines and guidance on how the voices of organizations of persons with
disabilities, especially those in Africa and other developing countries, can be
included.
2.
The
High-level Meeting should address the situation of persons with disabilities in
Africa as a priority issue both because Africa is often left out of such global
meetings and because challenges to advancing the situation of persons with
disabilities are greatest in Africa.
3.
The
High-level Meeting should also specifically address the situation of
particularly marginalized persons with disabilities, as well as the specific
needs of youth, older persons, children and women with disabilities, and
persons with psychosocial disabilities.
4.
The
outcome document of the High-level Meeting should also address the issue of how
resources may be made available to states that need them in order to advance
implementation of the CRPD and of the outcome document itself.
All the new Sustainable
Development Goals, targets and indicators should properly include persons with
disabilities by learning from the mistake made in
the Millennium Development Goals.
Shuaib
Chalklen
UN
Special Rapporteur on Disability
* This position paper was endorsed by FIDIDA, Finnish Disabled People's International Development Association.
* This paper was placed at the on-line consultation site: http://www.worldwewant2015.org/node/317006#comment-49969
* This position paper was endorsed by FIDIDA, Finnish Disabled People's International Development Association.
* This paper was placed at the on-line consultation site: http://www.worldwewant2015.org/node/317006#comment-49969